Erc Stg

% badness-ignore-file hard-coded-reference
% badness-ignore-file unreferenced-label

\documentclass[timesnewroman,partone,draftproposal]{erc-stg}

% {{{ packages

% better environments
\usepackage[shortlabels]{enumitem}
\usepackage[nameinlink, noabbrev]{cleveref}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{subcaption}

% better typography
\usepackage{microtype}

% }}}

% {{{ metadata

% \ercauthor{John Doe}
% \ercauthorlastname{Doe}
% \ercinstitution{Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)}
% \ercduration{60}
%
% \erctitle{Quantum Understanding and Simulated Analysis Research}
% \ercacronym{QUASAR}

% }}}

\begin{document}

% \ercsummary{}
% \ercnocrosssummary{}

\maketitle

\section*{Part I of the Scientific Proposal (max. 5 pages, references
do not count towards the page limit)}
\label{sc:synopsis}

\begin{erccomment}
\textbf{Part I of the Scientific Proposal} should present the envisaged research
and it should:
\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*, nosep]
    \item lay out the current state of knowledge,
    \item explain the scientific question and the objectives of the project, and
    \item present the overall approach or research strategy to reach the goals
    of the project.
\end{itemize}

Part I should convince the evaluation Panel that the proposal presents an original and
creative idea addressing an important question in the research field(s). It should
explain how the project will advance the frontier of knowledge, and what contribution it
will make to the research field(s) i.e.\ what may be changed, opened, challenged or how
the results of the work will alter the current understanding of the field.

When preparing Part I of the Scientific Proposal, applicants should keep in mind the
evaluation elements assessed by the panel at Step 1 --- see Section 1.6.5 of the ``ERC
Work Programme 2027''.

\textbf{At Step 1 of the evaluation, only Part I and the Curriculum Vitae (CV) and Track
Record (see below) are assessed by the evaluation panel}. Part I forms the basis for the
panel’s decision whether to evaluate the proposal in the next step. Therefore, all
essential information must be covered in this part.

References to literature should also be included. Please use a reference style that is
commonly used in your discipline such as American Chemical Society (ACS) style, American
Medical Association (AMA) style, Modern Language Association (MLA) style, etc.\ and that
allows the evaluators to easily retrieve each reference.

\textbf{Please respect the following formatting constraints: Times New Roman, Arial or
similar, at least font size 11, margin sizes (2.0 cm side and 1.5 cm top and bottom),
single line spacing.}
\end{erccomment}

\newpage

\section*{Curriculum Vitae and Track Record (max. 4 pages)}
\label{sc:sv}

\begin{erccomment}
You may modify the below template if necessary.
\end{erccomment}

\subsection*{PERSONAL DETAILS}
\label{ssc:cv:details}

\begin{erccomment}
Provide your personal details, your education and key qualifications, current
position(s) and relevant previous positions you have held.
\end{erccomment}

\noindent Family name, First name:

\noindent Researcher unique identifier(s) (such as ORCiD, Researcher ID, etc. \dots):

\noindent URL for website:

\subsubsection*{Education and key qualifications}
\label{ssc:cv:education}

\begin{erccvitem}
DD/MM/YYYY & \textbf{Ph.D.} \\
& Name of Faculty / Department, Name of University / Institution, Country, \\
& \underline{Name of PhD Supervisor}.
\end{erccvitem}
\medskip

\begin{erccvitem}
DD/MM/YYYY & \textbf{Master} \\
& Name of Faculty / Department, Name of University / Institution, Country.
\end{erccvitem}

\subsubsection*{Current position(s)}

\begin{erccvitem}
YYYY -- YYYY & \textbf{Current Position} \\
& Name of Faculty / Department, Name of University / Institution, Country.
\end{erccvitem}
\medskip

\begin{erccvitem}
YYYY -- YYYY & \textbf{Current Position} \\
& Name of Faculty / Department, Name of University / Institution, Country.
\end{erccvitem}

\subsubsection*{Previous position(s)}

\begin{erccvitem}
YYYY -- YYYY & \textbf{Position held} \\
& Name of Faculty / Department, Name of University / Institution, Country.
\end{erccvitem}
\medskip

\begin{erccvitem}
YYYY -- YYYY & \textbf{Position held} \\
& Name of Faculty / Department, Name of University / Institution, Country.
\end{erccvitem}

\subsection*{RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS AND PEER RECOGNITION}
\label{ssc:cv:research}

\subsubsection*{Research achievements}

\begin{erccomment}
Provide a list of up to ten research outputs that demonstrate how you have
advanced knowledge in your field with an emphasis on more recent achievements,
such as publications, articles deposited in a publicly available preprint
server, books, book chapters, conference proceedings, data sets, software,
patents, licenses, standards, start-up businesses or any other research outputs
you deem relevant in relation to your research field and your project.

You may include a short, factual explanation of the significance of the
selected outputs, your role in producing each of them, and how they demonstrate
your capacity to successfully carry out your proposed project.
\end{erccomment}

\subsubsection*{Peer recognition}

\begin{erccomment}
Provide a list of selected examples of significant recognition by your peers
if applicable, such as prizes, awards, fellowships, elected academy
memberships, invited presentations to major conferences or any other examples
of significant recognition you deem relevant in relation to your research field
and project.

You may include a short explanation of the significance of the listed examples.
\end{erccomment}

\subsection*{ADDITIONAL INFORMATION}
\label{ssc:cv:additional_information}

\begin{erccomment}
You may provide relevant additional information on your research career to
provide context to the evaluation panels when assessing your research
achievements and peer recognition as described above.
\end{erccomment}

\subsubsection*{Career breaks, diverse career paths and major life events}

\begin{erccomment}
You may include a short factual explanation of career breaks or diverse career paths
such as secondments, volunteering, part-time work, time spent in different sectors or
the effects of major life events such as long term illness, including events that have
no impact on eligibility, such as the effects of pandemic restrictions on research
productivity.
\end{erccomment}

\subsubsection*{Other contributions to the research community}

\begin{erccomment}
You may include a list of particularly noteworthy contributions to the
research community you have made other than research achievements and peer
recognition, and a short explanation of these contributions. The purpose of this
section is to allow the evaluation Panel to take a more rounded view of your career and
achievements and to ensure that any additional responsibilities, commitments
and leadership roles that you have taken on beyond your individual research
activities are recognised and taken into account.

\textbf{(for more information see ``Information for Applicants to the
Starting and Consolidator Grant 2027 Calls'')}

\textbf{Do NOT split Part I from the CV and Track Record and/or references and do NOT
upload them as separate documents. The peer reviewers will only receive one single
document for evaluation at Step 1. Hence, Part B1 should contain all elements as
explained in this template. If some parts of Part B1 are uploaded in the submission
system as separate attachments, the peer reviewers will not have access to them.}
\end{erccomment}

\end{document}

% kate: default-dictionary en_GB;