This is a browser estimate. It does not search other papers and it does not prove authorship. About 60 words is the useful minimum. Nothing is uploaded.
Stock phrasing + low burstiness pulled the score up. Confidence 71%.
Go unlimited with Bibby Pro, and unlock 70+ other tools. See Pro
Furthermore, a robust framework for data collection is essential. Moreover, researchers must delve into the multifaceted nature…
Paste text. Read the score. The free check needs no account and does not upload the passage.
Plain prose or LaTeX. Math, commands, and verbatim blocks are stripped so only the writing is scored.
Surprisal, burstiness, lexical diversity, n-grams, function words, openers, punctuation, stock phrases, and contractions.
Gauge + per-signal bars + sentence heatmap. Hover any sentence for its local AI-like score.
Low, flat surprisal across tokens often reads as AI. We use a bundled Zipf frequency model — a proxy, not a full language model.
Humans vary sentence length; many models don’t. Uniform commas and sparse questions or dashes also nudge the score.
“It is important to note,” “delve into,” “multifaceted,” repeated transition openers — classic tells we weight explicitly.
Grammar-word share, moving-average type-token ratio, and contraction rate help catch formal, over-smoothed prose.
Formal human academic writing can score high. Lightly edited AI can score low. No detector, including paid ones, can prove authorship. Use this to revise your own writing. Do not use it to accuse someone.
Paste about 60 words for a usable estimate. The free check needs no login and uploads nothing. Sign up to open the same draft in the editor.
It estimates how AI-like a pasted passage reads. The check runs in the browser. The text is not uploaded.
No. It does not search published papers. Use the plagiarism detector for source overlap.
No. Formal human writing can score high, and edited AI can score low.